George Siegmann, Ralph Lewis, Lillian Gish, and Henry B. Walthall in D. W. Griffith’s The Delivery of a Nation. Public area screenshot courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Those that have an effect on a superior angle towards an awesome artist comparable to Lillian Gish usually are not solely unaware of our cultural heritage but stubbornly unaware that art often comes from deeply imperfect individuals. If we’re to strip the names of each flawed artist from public buildings, cease watching their films, reading their books, viewing their paintings, or listening to their music, we may have little artwork remaining.”
* * *
In 1983-84, whereas I was writing The American Movie Institute Salute to Lillian Gish for CBS-TV with producer George Stevens Jr., I had the privilege of touring the nation to see nearly all of Miss Gish’s surviving movies and tv packages in numerous archives. It was an exciting expertise to review the pioneering work of the lady long considered the best actress of the silent display; Gish’s film profession, which can never be equaled, lasted from 1912 to 1987. As our host, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., put it, “She was there at the start of an artwork type.”
Her many great films range from Broken Blossoms, The Scarlet Letter, and The Wind in the silent days to the 1955 masterpiece The Night time of the Hunter. Her in depth work in the theater and television maintained her unequalled standards of deep emotion, humor, intelligence, grace, and integrity. Gish’s appearing is a beacon to point out us our humanity, and she or he was outspoken in the causes of common brotherhood and the preservation of our arts, especially movie.
So it was with mingled disbelief and outrage that I learn that Lillian Gish is the newest sufferer of our curse of “political correctness” run amok. The trustees of Bowling Inexperienced University in her native Ohio selected Might three to strip her identify from its Gish Movie Theater within the Scholar Union because she was one of many stars of D. W. Griffith’s 1915 silent epic The Start of a Nation. The theater was named after her and her sister, Dorothy, who was also a star of silent films. The college gave Lillian Gish an honorary diploma and had no drawback proudly honoring her extraordinary legacy till protests by the Black Scholar Union over her participation in Delivery led the university to forged her into the netherworld for representing what it calls the film’s “face of Aryanism.” (Hypocritically, the university has no plans to provide away Gish’s bequest for an endowment and scholarship program or her archival collection.)
A college ought to be a spot where the history of the arts is studied with care and perspective and the talk over artists’ legacies ought to be allowed to flourish, fairly than a spot where, as too typically occurs in the present day, we try to obliterate from awareness the controversial features of our troubled historical past.
Yes, The Delivery of a Nation is a deplorable movie, racist to its core, a full-hearted paean to the Ku Klux Klan made by an unreconstructed Kentuckian whose father had been a Confederate colonel. This appalling film provoked riots and helped result in a resurgence of the Klan. And but it’s also acknowledged as a landmark in film historical past, an ideal advance in the art of cinematic narrative storytelling. One of many many disturbing paradoxes of our nationwide history is that inventive significance could be linked to the repugnant ideology of slavery and white supremacy.
Gish participated wholeheartedly in Delivery and took an lively position in Griffith’s filmmaking career and sustaining his legacy. Questioning her involvement shouldn’t be as absurd as the best way John Ford, the longer term director who was then an actor, stuntman, and crew member, has been denounced as a racist by Quentin Tarantino for enjoying a bit part as a Klansman, even if that is solely a footnote in Ford’s lengthy and wealthy filmmaking profession. I’m wondering if Tarantino additionally thinks the actors who performed Klansmen in his Django Unchained are racists.
For all her brilliance as an actress, Gish by no means quite seemed to know the social issues surrounding Start. She made excuses for Griffith, claiming he was not likely a racist and providing a number of the similar sorts of tone-deaf, patronizing apologies he additionally made. However both also felt the need to make amends by filming Intolerance, Griffith’s 1916 epic through which Gish performs the symbolic Mom rocking the cradle of historical past, and by making the 1919 Broken Blossoms, an interracial love story between Gish’s British waif and a Chinese man (that movie additionally predictably comes beneath assault right now for having a white actor play the Asian position, even if, as Andrew Sarris wrote in The American Cinema, “When Richard Barthelmess first confronts Lillian Gish in Broken Blossoms, the delicate trade of emotions between the two gamers would defy the art of the best novelist”).
However moderately than behave like ostriches and fake The Delivery of a Nation doesn’t exist, or symbolically banish one among its main actresses, why can’t we research the movie and face its implications squarely and intelligently? Ought to an actor, nevertheless illustrious, be completely marked anathema for a serious, deeply misguided profession selection? Ought to we anticipate artists to be good human beings or their bodies of work all the time to reside as much as our modern requirements? It’s no defense to say that “everyone” was racist back in 1915, which was far from the case, though President Woodrow Wilson himself was a flagrant racist and hosted a screening of Start on the White Home in the presence of Griffith and Gish. The NAACP and lots of political and inventive figures deplored the film from the start, and for a lot of filmmakers it stays a cause celebre, notably Spike Lee, who judiciously skewers it in his 2018 movie BlacKkKlansman.
It might seem ironic, but extra precisely is a sign of his sophistication, that Lee in 2013 accepted the Dorothy and Lillian Gish Prize from the Gish Prize Belief for “his brilliance and unwavering courage in utilizing movie to challenge typical considering, and for the eagerness for justice that he feels deep in his soul.” Lee stated on that occasion, “Would you consider, two of crucial movies that impacted me while I was learning at NYU starred Miss Lillian Gish. Those movies have been D. W. Griffith’s The Start of a Nation and Charles Laughton’s The Night time of the Hunter. Isn’t it funny (typically) how life works? And the way ironic life may be? God could be a trickster. Peace and love to the Gish Sisters. . . .”
The Administrators Guild of America in 1999 provoked an issue by eradicating Griffith’s identify from its profession achievement award. Director Robert Sensible, one of the DGA board members on the time and a previous president of the guild, provoked an extra controversy when he informed me in a subsequent interview that he thought the guild was mistaken to dishonor Griffith and had overreacted to strain. (Bowling Inexperienced cited that DGA precedent as one among its justifications for stripping Gish’s identify from its theater.)
Nevertheless it’s gone time to get beyond knee-jerk, grandstanding outrage over our belated discovery that some actor or director or writer or composer as soon as (or perhaps greater than once; perhaps even typically) was responsible of social attitudes and actions we deplore. Underneath all this, I detect not a lot a critical want to confront our past in a nuanced, thoughtful means as a lot as a myopic form of self-congratulation. How a lot wiser and more tolerant are we at this time! Certainly, we might never be guilty of creating a movie that offends any specific group! However how will a few of our films of 2019 look to audiences a hundred years from now? We will only think about how benighted many will seem. The much-maligned black comedian Stepin Fetchit, a star within the 1930s, informed me in 1970 that “Hollywood was extra segregated than Georgia beneath the pores and skin,” and things haven’t gotten a lot better in Hollywood or, certainly, in our country at giant, the place our present president indulges white supremacist ideology.
A columnist for the Toledo Blade, Kirk Baird, made the novel suggestion that slightly than the college taking the motion it did, “relatively than stoking the flames of controversy with weak-willed capitulation and disregard for context,” Bowling Green should have “expanded the discussion right into a teachable second.” Then it might have “lived up to the college’s cost to teach the scholars via analytical considering, and to challenge typical knowledge as well as personal beliefs.” Baird proposed that the university ought to have provided “free screenings of the numerous work from Gish’s substantial oeuvre, which included The Delivery of a Nation, adopted by dialogue from university film professors, popular culture specialists, and historians and an viewers Q&A.”
Maybe it isn’t too late for that to occur, and other people to reconsider their rash actions as Robert Clever as soon as did, but schooling increasingly isn’t what our beleaguered instructional system is about anymore. Those that have an effect on a superior angle towards an ideal artist similar to Lillian Gish will not be only unaware of our cultural heritage however stubbornly unaware that art often comes from deeply imperfect individuals. If we’re to strip the names of each flawed artist from public buildings, cease watching their movies, studying their books, viewing their paintings, or listening to their music, we could have little artwork remaining. I think that’s truly the objective of our PC Police. They are basically anti-art. For artwork is inherently disturbing. It may possibly and will have the power to shake us up, make us question our preconceptions, make us reevaluate where we have now been, how far we’ve come, and the way far we nonetheless have to go.